Joshua Messiah Is Jesus Christ

We can hear words so often that we become hardened to them and forget what it’s like to have heard them for the first time.  To recreate this feeling, it sometimes help to consider the same words from different vantage points.

For example, the name Jesus Christ can  be just as accurately rendered as Joshua Messiah.  This is because of the variety of languages involved in the preservation of the Bible.  “Joshua” is the translation of a Hebrew name into an English name.  “Jesus” is the translation of the same Hebrew name, but having gone through Greek as an intermediate step between Hebrew and English.  The same goes for Messiah (which is directly translated from Hebrew to English) and Christ (which is the same word translated first from Hebrew into Greek and then Greek into English).  Thus Joshua means Jesus just as Messiah means Christ.

When, in New Testament times, people first began hearing of Jesus of Nazareth, they were hearing of “Joshua” of Nazareth.  Of course, among Jews this would call to mind the great leader who, upon succeeding Moses, led the people of God into the promised land.  That Jesus was also “Messiah” spoke of His anointing, which would remind the people of their great king David and all that was revealed about God in his time.  The name “Jesus Christ” invoked the great exploits of both Joshua and David.

Notice, therefore, that while the name “Jesus Christ” may only bring to our minds whatever experiences we have had with that name in our lifetimes, it would bring up rich histories for Jews who heard it in New Testament times as “Joshua Messiah.”  Sometimes there’s much more to a name than we realize.

Bible notes on this post.

The purpose of this blog is to proclaim Jesus Christ to those who want to hear about Him without having to join a church – or anything else – but Him.

392 Replies to “Joshua Messiah Is Jesus Christ”

  1. This is incorrect information. Jesus (even if you look it up in Websters dictionary) is a Latin origin. Christ’s Name was Yahshua (translates to Joshua in English). Yahshua was “changed to Iesous” at the council of Nicea, to promote Constantines religion of Paganism. The Latin name “Iesous,” was changed to Greek as “Iesus,” then in 1600, changed to “Jesus” when the “J” was introduced to the English language. Peter said there is ONLY ONE NAME given unto men, whereby a man MUST be saved. That Name was Joshua (Yahshua). “Joshua (son of Nun) was also changed to the “Latin translaiteration” in Hebrews, and Acts, yet his name in the English is still Joshua in English. ONLY by the Name of Joshua Christ can a man be saved. “Iesous” means “hail (Ie) Zeus (sous).” “Iesous” is ONLY found in Latin writings, and the Septuagint (Latin writings), which the OLD TESTAMENT was never written in, but was translated from the Masoretic text. Only the “new per-versions” utilize the Septuagint. The KJV uses the Masoretic. You will never find salvation in Jesus, nor in Jehovah. Salvation is in Joshua (Yahshua), and Hayah His Father.

    1. Don’t get hung up on pronunciations and different languages. God looks on the heart and He delights when we do what is right. What is right is to love others as He loved us when He died on the cross for our sins.

          1. God does condemn you, read the Word. “Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.” You will always be “under the law of Hayah” until heaven and earth “pass away.” Whether you “like it or not,” you are guilty!

                    1. I have fallen into grace. “For by grace are you saved through faith” (Ephesians 2:8). I trust Him, and I specifically trust Him to look past my linguistic limitations to my heart and its yearning for Him.

                    2. Then you are not “fallen into grace.” Grace does not mean “unmerited favor.” It literally means “Hayahs divine influence on your heart, with His reflection in your life.” That means you would reflect Hayah to all the world, and you cannot if you dont know Him, nor His Name.

                    3. No, I dont think so. You are following traditions, over the actual texts. Lets take for example “your name.” In Hebrew is “Miyka’el,” transliterated to Latin becomes “lakym.” Transliterate again to Greek, “Micahl,” To English is “Michael.” Same as the Hebrew. Anyone with “ears to hear” can hear that “Yashua” has never been named “Jesus” as that is a pagan Gentile name, not Joshua’s Name. It WILL ALWAYS COME BACK TO ENGLISH AS JOSHUA, not “Jesus.” A Monkey can understand that.

                    4. I only speak English. Therefore, even if someone calls me by name in another language, I wouldn’t recognize it. However, God, since He understands all languages, would hear His name called in any language. Therefore, no matter whether someone cries out Yeshua (Aramaic by way of Hebrew), or Jesus (English by way of Greek), or Joshua (English by way of Hebrew), or uses any other language, He will answer. The Savior is gracious to all who call upon Him.

                    5. Then you OBVIOUSLY have never read the Word.

                      “How then shall they call on Him (Hayah) in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom ****they have not heard?**** and how shall they hear without a preacher?

                    6. No, he doesnt. What part of “the Greek wasnt translated from the Hebrew texts until 1300” dont you get? Go do a study on the Qumran texts, and pay attention to what Hayah is telling you. The NT wasnt “translated” until Jerome of 1300. It was OFFICIALLY written in Hebrew to start with. For a follower of Constantine, you are pretty ignorant of the corruption he performed.

                    7. You accuse me of following someone while you also accuse me of being ignorant of that same someone. Doesn’t that strike you as weird?

                    8. No, it makes perfect sense. Many claimed that followed Hayah in Christs day, yet He said “You neither know Him, but follow the devil.” Hmmm….it hasnt changed in two thousand years…Pharisees still follow the devil.

                    9. Please justify your accusation. You say I am following Constantine and the devil by using the name Jesus for the Savior of the world whom you do not believe is divine. Have I got that right? And, if so, please justify your accusation.

                    10. Constantine who was a very evil man, “invented the name of “Iesu” in 325 ad, at the Council of Nicea.” This is a documented proof. Christ was NEVER known by the name of “Iesu” before this date, and in fact, it wasnt until 1300 ad, that the Hebrew texts were translated to Greek from Hebrew. They were officially or originally written in Greek. If you choose to follow satan, and reject the truth, then so be it. You make your choice, you either serve Joshua, or Jesus, you cannot serve two masters. And yes, they are NOT the same person.

                      “Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.”

                      Jesus was not “Christ.” Joshua was, is, will be. Constantine invented Jesus.

          1. The beginning of “doing good” is trusting in Him, Who He is, and WHAT HIS NAME IS, before you could ever do good, othgerwise you are a promoter of dead works!

            You call HIM a liar. Because He said, “And in very deed for this cause have I raised thee up, for to shew in thee my power; and that MY NAME may be declared throughout all the earth.”

            You are a liar sir, and a wild dog, a wolf in sheeps clothing. I pray all coming here will reject “your word,” and hear The Almighty’s. Because you do not speak His Word.

                    1. No you dont, in your “opinion” you do.

                      “Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.”

                    2. You are attempting to discourage people from calling on the name of Jesus Christ. That is the name that is above every name. If anyone here is working iniquity, it is you.

                    3. This is why we who proclaim His name must live lives of repentance, always seeking to keep ourselves free from evil. See 2 Timothy 2:19.

                    4. No, you are wrong again. Christ came out of darkness to shine the “Light upon us,” so we dont have to “repent anymore.” Man, Pharisees to the bone.

                    5. No one can know the Lord without repenting. The very reason He gave us “light” is so that we could turn from our sins and live like Him.

                      If you are not proclaiming the need for repentance you are supporting licentiousness. Our world is in dire enough straits already. Repentance to the righteousness of Christ is our only hope.

                    6. You obviously cannot understand scripture either. The law and the prophets was UNTIL John, since then the Kingdom of Hayah is preached. Repentance is “under the law,” or did you all fail to read that part, to hold to your own traditions?

                    7. My apologies, I was falling asleep. I meant “I speak every Word of Hayah, as He gives me to speak, I speak not of my own accord. I have researched, double checked with the original tongues, and not one Bible agrees with the original tongues, not even the KJV. The original Texts state Joshua was The Prophet, Messiah of Hayah, not “Hayah Himself.” Nor is He to be held up as Hayah. Paul makes this clear in 1 Cor. 15, that the Son steps down from His throne in the heavenlies, turning it back over to the Father, as He takes His earthly throne over King Davids House.

                    8. Are you kidding me?

                      “And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto (submitted under) him that put all things under him, that Hayah may be all in all.”

                      Very clear that the Son does not REMAIN at Hayahs throne.

                      If you dont think that is “very clear,” you are dumbest, blindest person to ever walk the face of the whole earth. My own kids comprehend this.

                    9. That verse doesn’t say anything about Christ leaving the throne and taking an earthly throne over David’s house. Sounds like you’re making a dogmatic assumption.

                    10. It plainly says He steps down from the throne, the prophets testify He shall sit upon Davids throne. Unlike you, I know how to understand the Spirit when He speaks.

                    11. Look here moron, the actual text says “Joshua steps down, and submits Himself to the Father, which agrees with the Father who stated to David, “I will raise up your seed to ascend your throne.” Davids throne is not in heaven, it is in Jerusalem. The dumbest of ignorant people can see this clearly. It is true what was written, “The wise of this world He hath made foolish, and blinded their eyes.”

                    12. David’s throne was the right hand of God, to which Jesus ascended after His resurrection from the dead (Psalm 110). This is the Jerusalem above, which Paul referenced in Galatians 4:26.

                    13. It plainly says He steps down from the throne, the prophets testify He shall sit upon Davids throne. Unlike you, I know how to understand the Spirit when He speaks. And dont bother satan trying to accuse me of something I speak against.

                    14. No dude, you lack of intelligence from the Almighty, shows you a fool, and a son of satan. Hate to say it, but you are lost. Turn around before He appears, or you are lost forever. ~ End of Correspondence.

                    15. No dude, your lack of intelligence from the Almighty, shows you a fool, and a son of satan. Hate to say it, but you are lost. Turn around before He appears, or you are lost forever. ~ End of Correspondence.

                    16. No dude, your lack of intelligence from the Almighty, shows you a fool, and a son of satan. Hate to say it, but you are lost. Turn around before He appears, or you are lost forever. ~ End of Correspondence.

                      In the words of Paul, “It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.” You are a Heathen.

                    17. And FYI, read up on Jerome, and the Vulgate, The Septuagint was rejected by the council of Jamnia (Hebrew scholars) because of its mistranslations, and heretical additions.

                    18. Rabbinic Judaism rejected the Septuagint in the wake of its having rejected Christ. The Septuagint was associated with earliest Christianity, which was belief that Israel’s messiah had appeared in the person of Jesus (Joshua or Yeshua) of Nazareth. It’s no wonder disbelieving rabbis would want to distance themselves from that translation and bring it into disrepute. In their view, it had contributed to belief in a false messiah.

                    19. Let me explain something to you about “sources.” You can quote the Bible all day long, and Jesus’ name all day long, that does not make it, nor Him your source. How many years have you among many millions of others “said a name,” that has no value thinking you were “saved?” Yet ANY Jew can tell you, that the name “Jesus” was not Christs Name, and never was. But you have to “despise Jews (Israel)” in order to reject the truth.

                      “Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.”

                    20. The Bible was written by Jews. Salvation has come to us all through their voice. And they were the ones who translated their Scriptures into Greek, assigning Joshua the name Iesous in Greek.

                    21. That is a bold faced lie. “Jews” did not write the Greek testament. “Jerome” was not a Jew, He was Roman. The apostles wrote Hebrew, and that is fact. Read up on the findings at Qumran.

                    22. The “Jews” did not write the Septuagint. They wrote the Masoretic text. It was Babylonian “Hasidic” Jews that wrote the Septuagint, and they arent considered Jews.

                    23. Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
                      7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
                      8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.

                      Than you have no understanding of what this means.

                    24. The Septuagint was translated by Jews according to the flesh. Whether they were also Jews according to the spirit is not for you or me to say. In any case, the apostles used their translation for the New Testament often quotes the Septuagint.

                    25. One minute you are asking for “Hayah” to have mercy on me and the next you are pronouncing curses on me. You don’t seem to have a consistent point of view.

                    26. Incorrect. I called you a false prophet (not a curse) because you are, and ask for Hayah to have mercy on you. End of it. Im done arguing with ignorant children that want their own way, and reject Hayah.

                    27. “Dogmatic assumption.”
                      by actsapostolos

                      I used this phrase in another post (, and I am going to explain “why I used it.” For so many centuries the church has been “lulled to sleep” with the traditions, rituals, systematic beliefs, which are pagan in origin. Let me explain: 300 years after Joshua Christs death, resurrection, and ascension to glory, pagans began “infiltrating” like “wolves” (see Acts 20:29) into the mainstream “religion” of Christianity, as Paul put it, “not sparing the flock.” Pagan doctrines (as Arius put it) started “altering” the doctrines of Discipleship, and bleeding over into Christianity. What once was the “honor and praise of our Master, and Judge Hayah,” became “worship of false idols, false deities, mammon, pagan chantings, blatant blasphemies, and false doctrines. What once our Master Joshua taught us, now became a worship of men, an elevation of “man to Godhood.” The word “Dogma” comes from a Hebrew phrase “Give not that which is Holy unto the dogs…(see Mt 7:6). Hebrews during Joshua’s day called “Gentiles,” dogs. Why? Because of their “manner, demeanor, attitude, and relentlessness.” Gentiles in those days (yet not all) cared not about the “things of Hayah,” but for their own selves, and would do anything (yes, ANYTHING) to attract followers. The Acts of the Apostles is filled with accounts of “Gentile doctrines, pagan worship of “goddess (queen) of heaven worship (now known as mother Mary worship),” etc. They prayed to “dead men, deities,” calling them saints, even as far as calling their priests “petra (Peter).” Sound familiar? The first “priest” of the catholic church was called “a petra.” This “tradition” was known centuries before Joshua walked the earth. Dogma (in satanism is “amgod”) literally means: “Dogma is the established belief or doctrine held by a religion, or a particular group or organization.[1] It is authoritative and not to be disputed, doubted, or diverged from, by the practitioners or believers. Although it generally refers to religious beliefs that are accepted without reason or evidence, they can refer to acceptable opinions of philosophers or philosophical schools, public decrees, or issued decisions of political authorities.[2] The term derives from Greek δόγμα “that which seems to one, opinion or belief”[3] and that from δοκέω (dokeo), “to think, to suppose, to imagine”.[4] Dogma came to signify laws or ordinances adjudged and imposed upon others by the First Century. The plural is either dogmas or dogmata, from Greek δόγματα. Today, It is sometimes used as a synonym for systematic theology. In a “pagans mindset,” their “dogma” is not to be argued against, spoken ill of, or any of the like, or they become “dogs, wolves, gnashing at the teeth.” This “systematic set of beliefs” did not have a foundation until 325ad, when Constantine (the great pagan himself) ordered bishops of the pagan churches to assemble, and form a “dogma.” No “Christian (follower of Christ, Disciple of Christ)” had a hand in this meeting. All attendees were followers of Ignatius (no proof of who he followed), Origin (no proof of who he followed), Alexander (again, no proof of who he followed), Polycarp (again, no proof of who he followed), Lucian (again…..) etc. “Assumptions” have been made that they followed the original twelve apostles, EXCEPT, the original twelve were deceased long before this meeting. Rumors were going around, etc. Rumors are not facts, theories are not facts, hypothesis is not a fact, assumptions are not facts, opinions are not facts. The ONLY one that holds to these ideas (who followed who) is the pagan church of Rome (see “Vatican”). “Jerome” (sanctified by the pagan church of Rome) “translated” Hebrew texts into Greek and Latin (see Vulgate), the which (Hebrew texts) Constantine ordered the destruction of, after their translation into Latin. By the grace of Hayah, some were preserved in Qumran (see DSS). Hermeneutics (a study of the pagan “god” Hermes - ) became a “systematic belief” at this meeting. Exegesis ( was formed, eisegesis, etc. None of the which were EVER used when Hayah spoke to His people, and commanded us to write, etc. These were NEVER followed, nor obeyed. Hayah commanded us to “adhere to His every Word (see Mt 4:4).” I command you, in the Name of Hayah, the Most High, The Almighty Judge of Heaven and Earth, GET RID OF THESE PAGAN DOGMATIC PAGAN ASSUMPTIONS, and GET BACK TO THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY HAYAH!

                    28. I wasn’t “trying” anything. I was just noticing that even though you rail against dogmatic assumptions, you make them. For example, you assume the Son of God gets angry when people call Him Jesus.

                    29. I make NO ASSUMPTIONS, and I dont follow “dogma.” I expose it for what it is, the devils handy work. Just like your “assumptions” that “Jesus is God and hears you,” is not even Biblical.

                    30. Apparently He taught Paul:

                      “Then said Paul unto him, God shall smite thee, thou whited wall: for sittest thou to judge me after the law, and commandest me to be smitten contrary to the law?”

                      Do you know what a “whited wall” is? It was a urinal, which was extremely offensive to call someone by. However, even the “dumb ass spake” unto Baalam, and “Baalam heard.” You refuse.

                    31. Who is your source for your interpretation of Paul’s metaphor? (“Whitewashed wall” makes perfect sense without such an interpretation, just as does the similar expression “whitewashed tombs” which Jesus used.)

                      Calling me a “dumb ass” is the right thing to do if God is telling you to do it. My question was, was God the one telling you to do it?

                    32. Pride refuses to admit when you are wrong. But we know the sons of satan, and the sons of Hayah. And anyone coming here, will see the truth. Hayah does not “hide Himself,” nor “hide behind” masks, and names. He is Hayah, that is His Name for ETERNITY! He is known by no other. “I am the Judge, I change not.” “Joshua Christ, the same yesterday, today, and forever.” Not “Jesus.” Jesus does not come from the Hebrew. It came from Constantine the Pagan.

                    33. Then please be more forthcoming about your sources. You’re declaring things to me without declaring the source of your teaching or even outlining your fundamental doctrine. All I’ve been able to gather from your many comments here are that you think it’s a mistake for someone to use the name Jesus instead of the name Joshua and that you don’t think Jesus was divine.

          1. Yes, He Most Certainly did. You have not The Spirit, but you have the spirit of Babylon.

            Then you call HIM a liar. Because He said, “And in very deed for this cause have I raised thee up, for to shew in thee my power; and that MY NAME may be declared throughout all the earth.”

            You are a liar sir, and a wild dog, a wolf in sheeps clothing. I pray all coming here will reject “your word,” and hear The Almighty’s. Because you do not speak His Word.

          2. Hayah wants you to know His Name, because it pertains to His covenants. You cannot enter into covenant with Him, if you know not His Name, and I have news for you son, you know not Him, nor His Spirit, because He most certainly does “command” us to judge. “And He shall show forth Judgment unto the Gentiles.” Paul later states that “He was to show judgment unto the Gentiles to fulfill scripture.” You know not HIM.

                  1. ” Ps 1:5 Therefore the ungodly shall not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous.”

                    I am an eternal Judge. You dont know what it means.

                    1. Wrong again. “Jesus” has never been the name of the Christ, nor “God.” God “Elohim” means The Judge Magistrate, not “Hayah.” Hayah was His personal Name, which is spelled “YHWH.” Pronounced Hayah.

                    2. What did Christ say Himself? “Broad is the way that leads to destruction….narrow is the path to righteousness, and few (look up few, and it means a handful) follow it.”

                    3. If someone invented a language today and it included a name for Jesus, God would acknowledge it when its speakers used it to call upon Him.

                      Nowhere in Scripture does God forbid us to translate His name.

                    4. You have to be down right stupid to reject His own Word. He said “My name Hayah shall be glorified to the ends of the earth,” Paul said “ONLY BY THIS NAME can you be saved,” Hayah led Israel through Egypt, the RED Sea, wilderness, promised land” to make HIMSELF a Name.!” You have to be not only ignorant, but RETARDED to reject the truth. Christ said “IN MY NAME (Joshua) these signs shall follow them that believe, demons cast out, sick healed, DEAD RAISED, the which NONE have been raised in the name of Jesus. Go pick up a serpent in the name of Jesus, and tell me it wont bite you and make you sick, or drink poison and you wont die. But in Joshua, none of these things occur.

                    5. You still haven’t explained why you make such a big deal between the names “Jesus” and “Joshua.” How did you come to your view? Who taught you this doctrine you are proclaiming?

                    6. Are you that stupid? I have shown you AMPLE evidences of PROOF, and it was Hayah Himself that gave me this knowledge. Not some book, not some “other person,” not “some tradition.” I follow NO MAN.

                    7. You have given me no chapter and verse that say it’s wrong to say “Jesus” instead of “Joshua.” How is it that God has given you this knowledge?

                    8. Hayah has not given it to me alone. Hayah has given it to many of us Hebrews. Salvation is to us first. Remember? Secondly, you will not find an English version of the Bible that holds to Christs Name, because they are written by men who are biased against Israel.

                    9. I have on my bookshelf The Jewish Annotated New Testament produced by Jewish scholars. They are certainly not biased against Israel and they use the name Jesus.

                    10. Because Hayah did not say “Dont speak my Name.” He said “Dont take my Name in vain.” Unlike my brethren, I am not afraid. I put Him first, and foremost as I was commanded to, even as Moses did.

                    11. What did Christ say Himself? “Broad is the way that leads to destruction, and MANY FOLLOW IT….narrow is the path to righteousness, and few (look up few, and it means a handful) follow it.”

    1. You are 100% accurate, and correct. If Gentiles do not call on the Name of Joshua Christ, they cannot receive salvation. IMPOSSIBILITY! There is only ONE NAME under heaven given unto men whereby they MUST be saved, and that was Joshua Christ, never has been Jesus. Jesus is not Christ’s Name, as “Jesus” wasnt even a “translated name.” Its origin was 1600 ad. Iesous (Iesus) wasnt introduced to the Catholic church until 700 ad. Gentiles are calling on a pagan deity for salvation, and will perish in their sins, for not knowing Him.

      1. The curse of Babel resulted in the many language with which we have to deal. Yet God’s blessing is greater than the curse. Whether we say “Jesus” or “Joshua” He will hear us as long as we are calling to Him from a pure heart. A pure heart is one that does not want to sin.

        1. Then you call HIM a liar. Because He said, “And in very deed for this cause have I raised thee up, for to shew in thee my power; and that MY NAME may be declared throughout all the earth.”

          You are a liar sir, and a wild dog, a wolf in sheeps clothing. I pray all coming here will reject “your word,” and hear The Almighty’s. Because you do not speak His Word.

                1. I dont believe Liars, and venomous serpents.

                  ” Mt 23:27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.”

                  He was talking to you.

                    1. Thats funny, because Isaiah says Joshua was ugly, and nothing about Him that we would desire.

                      “For he (Joshua) shall grow up before him (Hayah) as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he (Joshua) hath no form (beauty) nor comeliness (magnificence); and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him (Joshua). He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.”

                    2. Isaiah spoke this of the days of Messiah’s flesh. Of the day of His glory, Isaiah said, “In that day the Branch of the LORD will be beautiful and glorious…”

                    3. And what do you think He is now?

                      “Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.”

                    4. The “Kingdom of God” as you call it, is not here yet, until Christ appears, and that is the Final Sabbath. Nobody has entered into it yet except for Christ Himself.

                    5. Sounds like you think Jesus was wrong about when the kingdom of God would come. I can’t imagine His being wrong about anything He taught.

  2. Hey Gantt, if the Name “Jesus” were His real Name, it wouldnt matter what language you translated it from, it would still always come back to Joshua, not Jesus. You obviously have no understanding of how “language transliteration” works. When you take “Yahshua (actual Hebrew Name) and translate it to English, it will be Joshua. If you take the same Name “Yahshua” and “transliterate” it, it will still return to the English language as Joshua. Not Jesus. Jesus originated in Latin, it is not a “translated name.” It didnt even come into existance until 1600 ad. The name “Iesous” wasnt used until 700 ad, and first used by the pagan emperor Constantine. Christs Name has NEVER been Jesus. It is Joshua.

    1. Whether I call Him Joshua, Jesus, Iesous, Lord, or any other of His many names, He will still hear me and look favorably upon me because I believe in Him and love Him.

      1. Then you call HIM a liar. Because He said, “And in very deed for this cause have I raised thee up, for to shew in thee my power; and that MY NAME may be declared throughout all the earth.”

        You are a liar sir, and a wild dog, a wolf in sheeps clothing. I pray all coming here will reject “your word,” and hear The Almighty’s. Because you do not speak His Word.

              1. No it isnt. First of all, “Transliteration (go look it up)” never changes in one language to “another name.” It will always go back to the same name. It will ALWAYS COME BACK TO JOSHUA MORON!

                1. The Greek word rendered “Jesus” in Matthew 1:1 is the same Greek word rendered as “Joshua” in Hebrews 4:8. Transliteration of that Greek word into English is “Iesous.”

                  1. No it isnt. Go read it again. Even Noah Webster (which was before James Strong) states in His 1806 Dictionary that “Jesus” did not derive from the Hebrew, but was a Latin formation in the year 700 ad.

                    1. You dont know Hayah.

                      “Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying.”

                    2. What you’ve already said has been troubling enough. Unless you can show your teaching in the Scripture, there’s no reason for me to take you seriously.

        1. He who calls upon the name of the Lord will receive help from the Lord. He will not reject someone on the basis of technicalities of pronunciation and language.

            1. Neither will He respond under “any other Name.” He said HIS NAME “Hayah” will be exalted to the ends of the earth. Not the “title of God, not Jehovah (pagan name), not Yahweh, not “Lord,” Not “Jesus,” But “HAYAH (HAYAHSHUA).” Translated as “JOSHUA!” NOT “jesus.” It matters to Hayah THE JUDGE OF THE EARTH.

              “Ps 48:10 According to thy NAME (HAYAH), O JUDGE, so is thy praise unto the ends of the earth: thy right hand (JOSHUA CHRIST) is full of righteousness.”

              “Pr 30:4 Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is his NAME (HAYAH), and what is his son’s name (HAYAHSHUA), if thou canst tell?”

              “Isa 52:10 HAYAH hath made bare his holy arm (HAYAHSHUA) in the eyes of all the nations; and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God.”

              “Jer 16:19 O HAYAH, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.”


              “Mic 5:4 And He (HAYAHSHUA) shall stand and feed in the strength of HAYAH, in the majesty of the NAME of HAYAH His JUDGE; and they shall abide: for now shall He be great unto the ends of the earth.”


                    1. No He will not, because it isnt His Name. Dude, what part of “that name didnt exist until 1600, and “Iesus” didnt exist until 700″ dont you understand? That was never Christ’s Name. EVER!

  3. This is how Hayah the Father of Joshua Christ thinks His Name is important above ALL other names.

    “Jer 29:23 Because they have committed villany in Israel, and have committed adultery with their neighbours’ wives, and have spoken LYING WORDS IN MY NAME, which I have not commanded them; even I know, and am a witness, saith HAYAH.”

    “Jer 32:34 But they set their abominations in the house, which is CALLED BY MY NAME (HAYAH), to defile it.”

    “Jer 23:26-27 How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; Which think to cause my people to forget MY NAME (HAYAH) by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have FORGOTTEN MY NAME FOR BAAL (Jehovah, Jesus, both are Baal).”

    “Jer 16:21 Therefore, behold, I will this once cause them to know, I will cause them to know mine hand and my might; and they shall know that MY NAME IS HAYAH. ”

    “And The Judge said unto Moses, HAYAH is HAYAH: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, HAYAH hath sent me unto you. And The Judge said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, HAYAH JUDGE of your fathers, the JUDGE of Abraham, the JUDGE of Isaac, and the JUDGE of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: THIS IS MY NAME FOREVER, and THIS IS MY MEMORIAL UNTO ALL GENERATIONS.”

    ELOHIM – Hebrew for Chief Magistrate, JUDGE! Its a position, not a name. Hayah is His Name, Ha(Yahshua) is His Sons Name, translated as “Joshua” in English, not “Jesus.” Jesus or “Iesu (Latin) didnt exist (and you wont find it today anywhere in Israel) until 700 ad. Joshua (Hayashua) is found everywhere in Israel, even today. Hayah thinks His Name is more important than your own life. Who are you to contend and argue with the Almighty over His Name “not being important?” For it is written:

    “Ac 2:21 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call ON THE NAME of the MASTER shall be saved.”

          1. Where did Hayah speak to His people in English? He didnt even speak to them in Greek, let alone English. You are corrupt if you think for one moment that the English language is not a perversion of every combination of language (see Gen 11:1-7) on the face of the planet. It is now spoken in every country on the planet. Babel has restarted. Called the English Language.

                    1. Actually, Jesus said “Salvation is from the Jews” (John 4:22). Paul was the one who said, salvation was “to the Jew first” (Romans 1:16).

                    2. Just as I thought….you only know the parts you “want to know,” and the rest you forsake. Salvation is “of” the Jews, and to the Jew first. They are Hayah’s ministers continuing constant on this very thing. You, know not what you speak of. Have a nice day, and I hope Hayah will forgive you for your lies.

  4. Admitting that you have been deceived into believing another name, is the first step of repentance. You are deliberately forgetting Hayah, and Yahshua’s Name for Baal, and what makes you a reprobate, is you “willing to forget His Name.”

      1. Because “Hayah” is not found in the English, it His literal Hebrew Name. The Covenant Name that He gave to Israel, and said “This is my name for eternity.” If you cannot understand and read Hebrew, you have NO BUSINESS teaching anyone.

          1. Read what Paul wrote in Romans 3. Hayah committed His oracles to the Hebrews to be His Ministers, to Minister to the world. Paul again states, “They have not all fallen, but the election have obtained it, and the rest were blinded.” Not one single Gentile in the NT taught anyone. They were all Hebrews. Read it. It was left up to us, to administer His word, and grace unto the hearers.

                1. When the Jews translated their Scriptures into Greek in the 3rd Century B.C. (what we today call the Septuagint), they did not transliterate “YHWH” but rather translated it as “Kurios” which is translated to English as “Lord.” The Jews who wrote the New Testament used Kurios and not YHWH.

                    1. Even Wikipedia knows you’re wrong about that. See its article on the Septuagint where you’ll find this sentence: “Of significance for all Christians and for Bible scholars, the Greek Septuagint is quoted by the New Testament, particularly by Paul the Apostle…”

                    2. Wikipedia “duplicates” knowledge from a lot of sources, just like any encyclopedia. No one goes to an encyclopedia for ground-breaking knowledge. They go there for what’s common knowledge among those who know the field.

                    3. Wikipedia is a catholic owned website. 99% of their “sources” are what is taught in their “traditions.” Peter was never a bishop of Rome, never stepped foot in Rome.

                    4. You sound like a conspiracy theorist. Wikipedia is sourced by volunteers. I am no apologist for the Catholic church, but the idea that they control Wikipedia is ludicrous.

                    5. Really? Get a clue buddy. Go do a search on the “apostles” and it agrees with the Catholic church, which holds no proof of anything of the apostles after the book of Acts.

                    6. Then you are a liar.

                      “And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.”

                      “Pr 30:4 Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is his name, and what is his son’s name, if thou canst tell?”

                      “Ac 2:34 For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, Hayah said unto my Master, Sit thou on my right hand…..”

                      “(Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
                      He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.)”

                      Christ Joshua is the ONLY one that has EVER ascended into heaven.

                      You are a liar. Joshua never showed you anything. Especially when it contradicts the Word.

                    7. I’m not saying that David ever sat on a heavenly throne. Rather, God raised the Davidic throne to heaven when He raised His Son and fulfilled Psalm 110:1.

                    8. I think everyone knows what Wikipedia is, including its strengths and weaknesses.

                      Regarding the link you posted, who is V.S. Harrell and what point is he trying to make?

                    9. He is a “scholar” that has spent some 70 years on researching the truth, and the “false claims” people like you make on the Bible. His point, is that the KJV is the ONLY Bible that was translated from the Masoretic (actual Hebrew texts from the Temple) and the Textus Receptus (Dorn Greek texts) which no other Bibles use, they use the Hellenistic Septuagint which wasnt even accurate nor correct in its texts.

                    10. I cannot find any bio for V.S. Harrell on the Internet. You say he is a “scholar” but if there is no accessible record of his credentials, why should I take your word?





                      All of these are “verified” documents, found with careful research from official sources, former priests that have “read the documents buried under the Vatican,” scholars, archaeologists, etc.

                    12. I tried to read each of the posts to which you linked.  They are not easy to digest.  I have several responses:

                      – You quote Warren H. Carroll.  I looked him up on Wikipedia and it reports that he defended the Spanish Inquisition and the idea of burning heretics at the stake.  I hope you don’t feel similarly.

                      – You argue against Trinitarianism.  I do as well.  However, you don’t seem convinced of the deity of Christ.  I am.  See There Is No Trinity; There Is Only Christ.

                      – Just writing isolated posts makes your ideas hard to understand.  I suggest you consider writing an overview for your site which will give people the general framework of your thinking so that they have a context for individual posts.  I do this for my readers at Introduction to This Blog.

                      – What you say in your About section is not very revealing, and it is very disturbing.  You seem to be suggesting that anyone who does not bow to your authority forfeits eternity with Christ.  This is false and absurd.  Jesus is characterized by love.  I do not see love in what you write.


                    13. What part of “That is not His Name” do you not get? He is under “NO OBLIGATION TO RESPOND” if you do not call Him by His Own Name. He made this explicitly clear. If I called you “Russ,” you are under no obligation to respond. Do you understand what that means? “Obligation – the act of binding or obliging oneself by a promise, contract, etc.” He gave us this Contract, and He holds to it.

  5. @ACTS – But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of The Magistrate Judge, should shine unto them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Joshua the Master; and ourselves your servants for Joshua’s sake.

    Leave him alone…..forgive him….he wont find the truth until his pride is removed.

    1. I don’t have any problem with your substituting the name Joshua for the name Jesus because they mean the same thing. Moreover, it’s sometimes helpful to make such substitutions when we’re reading (another example would substituting Messiah or Anointed for Christ) so as to help us think through what we’re reading and not just fall into mental ruts. However, if you are saying that the name Jesus cannot be used, then you are trying to change the word of God. Needless to say, that would not be good.

      1. No, you arent comprehending. Constantine “changed the Word.” Anytime you “transliterate a name through 3 languages,” it will always “pervert.” Hoever, if you do the history, Constantine “invented the name Jesus” in 700 ad. It is NOT the Name of Christ. NEVER WAS, but you are not going to suck me into your childishness, and ignorance. I know Hayah, I have carried on conversations with Him, and He with me. His Name is not “English,” nor ever has been. It CANNOT BE TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH! GET IT YET? OR DO YOU CHOOSE TO REMAIN IGNORANT?

        1. I have a Septuagint. It renders “Joshua” as “Iesous.” The Septuagint was translated hundreds of years before Constantine was born.

          Moreover, how could Constantine have invented anything in 700 A.D. when he lived 272-337 A.D.?

          1. Moron, you have a “septuagint” that was translated into English in 1300 ad. The English language didnt exist until “the fifth century ad.”

                    1. I tell people that they do not have to take my word for anything I write on my blog, that they can read their own Bibles and decide for themselves whether or not the things I write are true. You, on the other hand, are telling people that they cannot trust any English Bible and that must take your word as the truth.

                    2. Go read the Greek and Hebrew texts, and you will find that all English versions are corrupted. ANYONE can check it out, and see. You add “your personal interpretation” to scripture, which is illegal in the sight of Hayah.

                      This is the actual text:
                      “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Joshua consist without Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.” Joshua cannot exist, if the Father (Christ, Hayah) wasnt with Him. Anyone can check that out. “Esti-consists,” and “ou-without” appears between “Joshua” and “Christ.” Something the English did not “declare.”

      2. Actually Mike, you are incorrect on that one. Hayah sent His Word through the Hebrews (See Masoretic text which the KJV was translated from, as was the DSS, was written in Masoretic which dates back 500 years before Christ) which Constantine ordered changed in 700ad. If you did a little bit of research (which Hayah told you to do) you would find that our “English versions” are not even close to being accurate with the original tongues. Secondly, “Dorn Greek” was spoken during the 1st century (after the apostles), and Christ spoke Aramaic/Hebrew, and the angel Gabriel told Mary and Joseph to call their son, “Joshua.” Peter in Acts states that ONLY by the Name of Joshua (which was not translated to Greek until 1300 by Jerome) can one be saved (which Paul repeats over and over again in his epistles). So, if you want to keep arguing truth, I will shove it down your throat, because its obvious you choose (deliberately) to wallow in your own mire, in sin, which Hayah would have no use for you anyway, or you can choose to be saved, and ACCEPT THE NAME OF JOSHUA CHRIST AS THE LIVING SON OF HAYAH, THE ALMIGHTY JUDGE THAT WILL JUDGE YOU FOR YOU DISOBEDIENCE AND DOUBT AND UNBELIEF, AND FOR THE HARSH SPEECH THAT YOU SPEAK AGAINST HIM (SEE JUDE).

        1. I’m not speaking against the Lord. I love Him. This blog is for the Lord Jesus (look at the URL).

          Whether you call Him Jesus or Joshua or Yeshua, He is still the Lord of all.

          1. If you want a debate, then a debate is what you got. I can show you thousands of proofs that you are lying through your teeth, and are a follower of Constantine not Christ Joshua.

                    1. My office is the headquarters of the Constantines? And I don’t even know who the Constantines are? I am trying to answer your questions seriously but are really speaking absurdly.

                    2. This is why atheists hate christians. You cant even provide evidence, but have to argue about EVERYTHING. And when it doesnt agree with your “assumption,” you act like satan, and started finding fault, instead of correcting your own faults. Be it known unto you this day, that Judgment has come to your house, and you have been found wanting. Hayah hath removed your name from His book.

                    3. No son, you do. Hayah has given me a commandment to forsake you. You have fallen from grace.

          2. You need to go study up on Constantine, and what was going on from 325 ad, to 700 ad, with the edict of Milan. This is the Word of the Almighty Hayah, The Judge of the whole earth. You are following Constantine who was a Pagan, never was a christian. Constantine was a follower of the pantheon “gods,” and it was the same that “ordered the alteration of the texts from Hebrew to Latin and Greek. He ordered the Hebrew texts to be “burned,” so nobody could find out the truth of what he had done. One man in 325 ad, stood up against him, and debated that “he was merging Greek mythology into christianity,” and Constantine ordered this man (Arius) stripped of his title as “bishop,” and his “authoritative writings” to be burned. If you read my blogs, you will see what all Constantine did, and how “professed christianity” follows him, and not Joshua Christ. In Qumran was found the actual Hebrew Masoretic texts (written by the Israelites and disciples of Christ) which predate the Septuagint. Its a proven fact that Matthew wrote a Hebrew Gospel long before a “Greek version” was written, which states something completely different than the Greek texts. There is a Gospel of Peter, Gospel of Paul, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke that was written in Hebrew/Aramaic which predates the Greek texts. It was “Constantine that made Jesus a “god,” by his own statement “God from God, and God the Son, and Mary mother of God.” Hayah has no mother, He is Eternal, no beginning, no end. Joshua was “created,” not “from eternity,” He is now eternal at Hayah’s right hand. Zechariah the Prophet even states that Joshua Christ The High Priest is the BRANCH, and Hayah made Him so. But before Hayah made Him so, he had this to proclaim:

            “And he shewed me Joshua (Christ) the high priest standing before the angel of Hayah, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him (which we see throughout the NT).
            2 And Hayah said unto Satan, Hayah rebuke thee, O Satan; even Hayah that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire?
            3 Now Joshua (Christ) was clothed with filthy garments, and stood before the angel.
            4 And he answered and spake unto those that stood before him, saying, Take away the filthy garments from him. And unto him he said, Behold, I have caused thine iniquity to pass from thee, and I will clothe thee with change of raiment.”

            If Joshua Christ was “God (according to you all),” He would not be standing before “Hayah” in filthy garments with “iniquity.”

            According to Joshua Christ, He says “For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist.”

            There should in no wise be anyone that could prove you wrong, nor show you contradiction if you have “His mouth.” There would be no possible way I could show you numerous scriptures that prove you wrong if you had “His Mouth.” Not once has anyone been able to prove what I have said is a lie (your opinion doesnt count before Hayah) because He has given me the truth. Am I boasting? No I am not. I am simply stating a fact! Truth is truth, Truth has no “versions, no variation, no lies, no bending, no deception, no change, no alteration, not many faces, not “many truths,” there is ONE Truth. And He changes not, nor does His Name change. Trying to “twist His Name into another language” is “altering His own Word.” There is ONE NAME UNDER HEAVEN (not many translations of that name) given UNTO MEN WHEREBY WE MUST BE SAVED! IT IS JOSHUA, THE CHRIST! Stop, and think about it, use Logic (which comes from the word Logos), Our Master does not have two “English names.” Michael in Hebrew, is the same as Michael in Latin, Greek, and English. Translating Michael from Hebrew to English, and Hebrew to Latin, to Greek, to English, his name still comes back to the English as “Michael.” The same as it does with Joshua, UNLESS someone has altered it (added to Hayahs Word), before it got to English. That my friend is Logic. Isaiah in English, comes from Hebrew (Yeshahyah), when translated to Latin, to Greek, back to English is still Isaiah. It is not “altered into two different names.” ALL of the names in the Bible translated from Hebrew to English, can also be translated to Latin, Greek, back to English, and still carry the same as from Hebrew to English, they do not “change.” Nor does “Joshua’s.” The ONLY REASON why Joshua the son of Nun, and Joshua Christ appear as “Jesus” in the NT is because someone has “altered (changed)” those names to appear as another form, which Paul vehemently preached against!

            “But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. For if he that cometh preacheth another Joshua, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.”

            Paul KNEW through the spirit of prophecy that someone was going to come on the scene and change the Name of our Master! Thats why he warned us about the “beguiling of Eve,” and the “falling away from the simplicity in Christ Joshua.” He even warned us in the book of Acts, that “WOLVES were going to enter in, and not spare the flock.”

            Spare – forbear, to be chary.
            Chary – 1. wary; careful
            2. choosy; finicky
            3. shy
            4. sparing; mean

            To be cruel, leading the flock away from the Master, and from Salvation. You cannot deny that “changing the ONLY NAME GIVEN UNDER HEAVEN FOR SALVATION” is both cruel, vicious, and causes many to fall into perdition. But if you would rather fall away after the spirit of satan, go right ahead. I choose to follow the Master, the Savior my Redeemer, Joshua Christ, the same Name that Moses changed Hosea’s name to after seeing Him in a vision in the mount, that Hayah would raise Him up as a prophet like unto Moses, to save Hayah’s people. To say anything but, is to reject your ONE and ONLY Salvation.

            “Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts. For if Joshua had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of Hayah. For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as Hayah did from his.”

                    1. Why would I be telling him to stop talking to you, if I were him. Wow, not only do you not comprehend scripture, but you cant even discern between different people. I’m out of here. Dont bother responding back.

  6. Mt 6:33 But seek (to diligently search for) ye first the kingdom of The Judge Magistrate, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

    “Ask (beg or crave), and it shall be given you; seek (to diligently search for), and ye shall find; knock (to beat vehemently), and it shall be opened unto you: For every one that asketh (begs or craves) receiveth; and he that seeketh (to diligently search for) findeth; and to him that knocketh (beats vehemently) it shall be opened.”

    “Lu 13:24 Strive (to struggle, literally (to compete for a prize), figuratively (to contend with an adversary), or genitive case (to endeavor to accomplish something):–fight, labor fervently, strive) to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek (diligently search for) to enter in, and shall not be able.”

    Many are trying to enter with the name “Jesus,” and shall not be able. Why? He said so Himself:

    “Many will say to me in that day, Master, Master, have we not prophesied in ***thy name?*** and in **thy name** have cast out devils? and in ***thy name*** done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity (sin, lawlessness).”

    If “HIS NAME” delivers you from all sin (He said it did), then those that are “calling on the wrong name,” are workers of lawlessness, and sin.

    Here is a clue, the Name of Hayah Almighty, is NOT found anywhere in the name of Jesus. It is found in the name of Joshua (Hayahshua).

    1. YHWH is pronounced “Hayah,” (W sounds like a Y in Hebrew, Y is H). The sound of “breath,” The ETERNAL Existing Covenant Judge Creator. He that becomes His Word, That fulfills His Word.

      1. Scholars have been either disagreeing or uncertain about how to pronounce YHWH for a long, long time. What makes you think that you’ve settled the dispute?

          1. Please explain yourself. Surely you don’t mean that there is a physical imprint of a name on your forehead that would be visible to others. What then do you mean?

            1. Are you stupid? Are you that illiterate of scripture that you have no clue what I am talking about? What the crap do you think we are doing on this earth man? We are “laboring” for Hayah to “put His Seal in our foreheads.”

              “And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of Hayah in their foreheads.”

              Do you see that? The only ones hurt are those that “dont have His Seal, mark, Name” in their foreheads.

              “Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my JUDGE, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my JUDGE, and the name of the city of my JUDGE, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my JUDGE: and I will write upon him my new name.”

                1. Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

                    1. And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto nepios’ in Christ.
                      2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
                      3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as Adam?

                    2. Read it again. Between “Joshua” and “The Christ” is two Greek words.
                      Esti – ou, which means “consists without.”
                      Anyone that says “Joshua consists (exists) without Christ is antichrist, and rejects both Father and Son.

    2. But you fail to notice that the reason He said they’d be denied entrance was not because they used the wrong name or mispronounced it, but rather because they sinned.

          1. Read the first commandment. Calling Him by any other name provokes Him to anger.

            ” I am HAYAH thy JUDGE, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Have no other “gods (judges)” in front of me.”

              1. Do you understand what the word “vain” means? It means to regard His Name as “empty, unfulfilling, unnecessary.” You think His Name isnt necessary, or you wouldnt be trying to “substitute it” for another.

              2. Really? Pay attention:

                “Yet they tempted and provoked the most high God, and kept not his testimonies: But turned back, and dealt unfaithfully like their fathers: they were turned aside like a deceitful bow.”

                Not keeping His Name is “not keeping His testimonies,” because He testified to KEEP HIS NAME in your memory.

                “And ‘Elohim said unto Moses, Hayah is Hayah: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, Hayah hath sent me unto you. And ‘Elohim said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, HAYAH ‘Elohim of your fathers, the ‘Elohim of Abraham, the ‘Elohim of Isaac, and the ‘Elohim of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: THIS IS MY NAME FOREVER, and THIS IS MY MEMORIAL unto all generations.”

                Memorial – 2143 Zeker, To remember, to keep, or obtain in ones memory. From 2142, Zakar, to mark (so as to be recognized), by implication, to mention; make to be remembered.

                Only a wolf, and a liar tries to scatter His sheep.

                “Joshua said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, HAYAH.

                Even Christ Himself remembered Hayah’s Name, because He was His Father.

                1. You are making God into the pettiest of tyrants, consumed by worry that someone won’t spell His name right. God is gracious. He is kind. He is just. You are completely misrepresenting His nature.

                  1. No son, the pagan church has misrepresented His nature since Constantine. Hayah is a CONSUMING FIRE. Read even Pauls account of Him.

                    1. No you arent. By you making the “false claims” that you do, you are identifying yourself to the people as a teacher, which you are by far, far from.

                    2. What part of you “teaching,” do you not get that “you are assuming the position of teacher?” If anything, you are a joke, a blasphemer, and are leading Christ’s sheep away from Him.

                  2. No son, the pagan church has misrepresented His nature since Constantine. Hayah is a CONSUMING FIRE. Read even Pauls account of Him.

                    You are the Fattest of liars that I have ever had the dis-privilege to meet.

                    Then HAYAH said unto me, The prophets prophesy lies in MY NAME: I sent them not, neither have I commanded them, neither spake unto them: they prophesy unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of nought, and the deceit of their heart.

                    1. No see, unlike those that “pronounce curses,” I actually “walk the Word.” I dont just talk it.

                    2. I know Jesus, and He knows me.

                      “Jesus loves me, this I know,
                      for the Bible tells me so.
                      Little ones to Him belong,
                      They are weak but He is strong.”

                    3. Oh yeah, where do you find that “song” in the Bible? Either Hayah’s Word is the Final Authority, or you are full of crap, which I know you are, because one man cannot have two names in any language. Go look up Gabriel, Michael, Joshua in the Hebrew, and Greek and you will not find them carrying any other name in English. Joshua is Christ, Jesus was a pagan name given by Constantine. ALL Hebrews know that, which is why they reject “pagan messiahs.” You are doing nothing but blaspheming Hayah.

                    4. Yep, all “your opinions,” and none of it Hayah’s. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

                  3. Obviously you havent read “Hayah is a Spirit…..” He has never had flesh and blood. You are the corrupter of His character….He has no nature. You are a Pagan, plain and simple. Have fun in the grave.

  7. Mike Gantt said, on June 28, 2012 at 5:03 am

    John 20:31 IESOUS ESTIN HO CHRISTOS ( Interlinear of John 20:31)

    Acts 9:22 HOUTOS ESTIN HO CHRISTOS ( Interlinear of Acts 9:22)

    1 John 2:22 IESOUS OUK ESTIN HO CHRISTOS ( Interlinear of 1 John 2:22)

    1 John 5:1 IESOUS ESTIN HO CHRISTOS ( Interlinear of 1 John 5:1)

    This is the Factual Greek Moron, taken from the TR, the most accurate, and first Greek document that we know of.

    “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ ? He is antichrist , that denieth the Father and the Son .” 1 John 2:22

    Esti ou means “consists [exists] without.”

    Thus the scripture states, “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus *exists without* Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.”

    1. Here are 18 different English translations, all of which translate the phrase in John 20:21 as “Jesus is the Christ” (or “Jesus is the Messiah” or “Yeshua is the Messiah” or “He is the Christ”).

      None of them translate the phrase as you do. Why should anyone believe your translation over all of these?

      By the way, here’s a list of English translations showing which ones rely on the Textus Receptus (TR).

      1. Hey moron, Go get an “interlinear,” even the Hebrew Bible, states that it says what I showed you. Anyone that denies Joshua can exist without Christ is antiChrist, which you all are.

          1. What I just posted to you was The KJVI (Interlinear) and the HBI (Hebrew Bible Interlinear), which both agree.

            “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is (consists) (without) the Christ ? He is antichrist , that denieth the Father and the Son .”

              1. Check the KJV on all of the four verses I gave you (John 20:31; Acts 9:22; 1 John 2:22; 5:1) and see that they all say “is the Christ,” not “consists without Christ.”

                    1. What readers? Son, if you had readers, they would be posting amidst our discussions. They are not. Obviously, you are conceited, and think people listen to you. I am warning you, you are leading His sheep away from the truth, and for that, Christ will take your life for it. He cares for His sheep, not for the wolves in “sheeps clothing.”

                    2. Wow, what an ego. You actually think people are reading your crap? Dude, if you had “readers,” dont you think they would be “interrupting” our conversation? You have to be EXCEEDINGLY CONCEITED to even assume you have readers.

                      How many know that “Jesus” was not Christ’s name? The actual Hebrew Name of Christ is “Yashua” translated as “Joshua” in the English. What does it matter some might ask? Peter explained in Acts 4:11-12;

                      “This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is NONE OTHER NAME UNDER HEAVEN given among men, whereby we must be saved.”

                      Does that mean, that if we translate that name, lets say into Latin, or Chinese, or any other language, that there is salvation in the “translated name?” Not according to The Almighty.

                      “How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal.”

                      Forgot – Hebrew 7911, to be oblivious of, from want of memory, to mislay.

                      Baal – Lord, lord, Lord, Jehovah.
                      Baal gawd – “Lord God.”

                      YHWH (Hayah) said that “they have forgotten my Name to serve Baal.”

                      So where does the name “Jesus” come from? “Hail – Zeus,” in Latin is “Iesu,” “Iesous” in Greek. We get the name “Jesus” from “Jupiter – Zeus,” one of the “Greek gods of mythology.” Here’s what Hayah (YHWH) says about using “name of other gods (deities)”:

                      “Isa 42:8 I am HAYAH (YHWH): that is my name: and my glory (honor, praise) will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images (Jupiter-Zeus was a graven image setup by the Greeks).”

                      Christ Joshua (Yahshua) said: “And except that HAYAH (YHWH) had shortened those days (those days are today), no flesh should be saved: but for the elect’s sake, whom he hath chosen, he hath shortened the days. And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not: For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.”

                      Constantine did just that. He made a “false Christ” calling him “Jupiter – Zeus,” or “Iesous” which later in 1600ad, became “Jesus.”

                      Great signs and wonders have been performed by this “false Christ” that everyone in the world has “followed after.” The name “Iesous” didnt even come into play until 325ad at the council of Nicaea. It was Constantine I that first introduced the phrase “God from God, and God the Son,” insinuating that “god was a three headed idol.”

                      Now, before you start mouthing off “religious rhetoric,” I beg of you to do a google search on the words “hail Zeus,” “Zeus is Iesous,” and look at the images (idols) of Zeus, and Jesus, and look at their similarities. It was Constantine I that introduced “paganism into Christianity.” All that “stood against him for this cause,” were “banished from Constantinople,” “Burned at the stake,” had their “writings burned (destroyed),” For this cause, a copy of the “Temple texts (Aleppo Codex), which were the original texts of the Hebrew Testament were hidden away, and kept secret until 1946 in “Aleppo Syria,” in a Library away from “rioters, looters, thieves, etc.” The Septuagint (supposedly documented to be the writing of 100-200bc) is a work of “mistranslations,” according to Hebrew scholars. This same “document” is what 99% of all English speaking Bibles today are translated from, except one, which is the KJV. No, I do not “hold the KJV up as some “perfection of Hayah,” as it too carries its “mistranslations.” In “Qumran cave 4” there has been found the original writings of the apostles in Hebrew/Aramaic, not “Greek” as some lie and profess. The truth is, the NT (New Testament) wasnt written/translated into Greek until 300-400ad by Jerome. (Do a Wikipedia search of Jerome, and you will find the truth). Jerome was asked by Constantine I to make a “Greek translation” of the Hebrew Bible, for “his new universal religion called “Catholicism (Universal).”

                      Is it a little odd that our Bibles today are missing “several books” that were included by the original apostles, quoted by the original apostles, and it was the original apostles that warned us to avoid this “new religion.”

                      “Mt 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”

                      “Ac 20:29 For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.”

                      Jude (brother of Joshua Christ and James) warns us again:

                      “Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our Yah into lasciviousness, and denying the only Master Hayah, and our Master Joshua Christ.”

                      Is it any wonder that “atheists” reject what is called “Christianity” today? In the apostles’ day, “atheists” were converted “readily,” without argument. Why? Because the apostles “spoke the truth.” They didnt quoted “books full of errors, mistranslations,” and none of the apostles “disagreed,” and started other “sects” of Christianity, professing that theirs was the only truth, and to reject the other apostles’ teachings. Yet today, this doctrine of devils is on an uprise. Paul warned us of this in 2Co 11:3-4

                      “But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. For if he that cometh preacheth another Joshua, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit (spirit of antichrist), which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.”

                      Constantine I did just that. He created “another gospel,” that carried “another spirit” which the people “tolerated,” which the apostles did not teach.

                      I warn you, get out of this “universal religion,” and get back to the ONLY NAME that holds Salvation. “Yahshua (Joshua) Christ,” and His Father “Hayah (YHWH).”

                      “And YAH said unto Moses, HAYAH IS HAYAH: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, HAYAH hath sent me unto you. And YAH said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, HAYAH YAH of your fathers, the YAH of Abraham, the YAH of Isaac, and the YAH of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.”

          2. This ( is not an Interlinear Bible. Interlinear shows you the original text alongside the translated text to show you the correct reading of the texts. “Esti ou” appears in all translations of the Greek texts, and it literally means “consists without” according to every Biblical Concordance. ANYONE that claims that “Yahshua (Joshua)” can exist without Christ (The Father) rejects both Father (Christ) and Son (Joshua).”

              1. Christ does not mean “Messiah” moron. Christ means “The Anointed One.” If you trace it back to the Hebrew, it also means “The Ancient One.” Joshua was “born.” He is not “eternal.”

                  1. No it isnt moron. “Meshiyach” is Hebrew, “Messiah” is English, “Messias” is Greek. Not “Christos.” “Meshiyach” means “deliverer.” Christ means “Anointed one,” or “Ancient One.” It does not mean “Messiah.” But alas, that is why Joshua Himself said, “I thank you Father, that you have revealed this unto babes, and not unto the wise of this world.”

                  2. Let me show you this, and I want you to read it slowly, and “re-read it” until it gets through that thick stiff neck of yours.

                    Hebrew – Meshiyach
                    English – Messiah
                    Greek – Messias
                    Christos? This is not a Greek word for Messias. It means “The Ancient One, or the Anointed One.”
                    Messiah – Deliverer
                    Christ – Anointed One

                    Not even close to the same thing.

                    Re-read it over, and over until it sinks in. Messiah in Greek is “Messias.” Not “Christos.” 6 Words before John the apostle even metions “Christos,” he uses the Greek word for Meshiyach, which is Messias. Not “Christos.” He states that Christos is “methermeneuo” which means “something hidden,” which also comes from the Greek word “meta” which means “within.” Christ is “someone hidden within Joshua.” Called the Father.

                    “Joh 16:32 Behold, the hour cometh, yea, is now come, that ye shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone: and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me.”

                    Christ is the Father.

                    1. You people make me sick. You are so ignorant of the devices satan has used to throw you off of Christs path, that you have built up walls of confusion around yourselves that you cant even break through yourselves. Satan has lead you, scholars, and millions who profess christianity for 2,000 years down the wrong path, that it will take you 2,000 years to get back on the right path. It is so sad, that you can be this ignorant, and this far off from the truth. I want to vomit everytime I hear you people spew this ignorant crap out of your mouths, claiming that “you worship the god of Abraham” when you have no clue that you are descendants of Ishmael, both of the spirit and flesh. Ishmael served Baal, not Hayah, the Yah of Abraham. Nor did Hayah give any inheritance or promises, or covenants to Ishmael. Have you not all read “it is written?”

                      “For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman…..But as then he that was born after the flesh (you) persecuted him that was born after the Spirit (me), even so it is now. Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.”

                      Do you people not see that you are coming to an end? “IT IS WRITTEN”

                      “And they (Isaac’s seed) shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles (you), until the times of the Gentiles (you) be brought to an end.”

        1. You’re overlooking the word “denies” in the sentence, which makes a double negative. Check the same site for John 20:31; Acts 9:22; 1 John 5:1 where no double negative is involved.

          1. Wrong stud. There is no “double negative” in that scripture, if there were, John would be saying “He that says Jesus consists without Christ is telling truth.” He does not. He plainly says “He that denies that Joshua exists without Christ is a liar, and rejects both Father and Son.”

              1. As I told you ten times before, “scholars” that “translated” had no understanding of the words “esti ou,” and translated it as “es (is) ti (the).” Esti is “one” word, not two. The understanding of “esti ou” was discovered in 1878, when James Strong went into the Greek language, and studied it. Something that was not available in 1600.

  8. Here is something funny. Using your “method (google translate) I just translated the TR of 1 John 2:22, which states:

    “Τίς ἐστιν ὁ ψεύστης εἰ μὴ ὁ ἀρνούμενος ὅτι Ἰησοῦς οὐκ ἔστιν ὁ χριστός οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ ἀντίχριστος ὁ ἀρνούμενος τὸν πατέρα καὶ τὸν υἱόν.”

    Translations: “The son is he a liar But if son lest denying that He is not Jesus Christ, This is the Antichrist, denying son father and son.”

    Problem, “huios” is not listed before “Pater.” So google is wrong in translation. Or, your scholars are way the hell off.

    1. My mistake, that wasnt the TR, it was the Septuagint.

      This is the TR.

      “tiV estin o yeusthV ei mh o arnoumenoV oti ihsouV ouk estin o cristoV outoV estin o anticristoV o arnoumenoV ton patera kai ton uion.”

      Which again, using your method of “google translate,” shows a problem.

      “tiV estin o yeusthV ei mh o arnoumenoV oti ihsouV ouk estin o cristoV outoV estin o anticristoV o arnoumenoV ton patera kai ton uion.”

      It doesnt “translate it,” and also shows if being from “Finland.” Not Greek.

          1. I read an English Bible and I write an English blog. You are the one bringing up foreign terms. I don’t understand you, but I do understand Christ and honor Him.

            1. No you dont. You assume you do. Faith is not stiffnecked, it is not hardhearted, it is not deaf, it is not blind. Faith is a substance of spiritual facts. Faith is the evidence of the unseen according to Paul. You say you honor and worship Yah, yet you worship Him through the name of the devil? I dont think so son. Thats not how it works. 90% of the English language gets its “definition” from pure paganism. Everey day, every month, every vehicle, every star, everything in the English Language is named after “pagan gods,” the same that Hayah said “Dont even let their names come from your lips.” Yet you do, and then you blame Yah when things dont go your way. People die right and left, and Yah told you why. “My people die for want of knowledge.” Death and life are in the power of the tongue, yet you curse yourselves on a daily basis, because you reject the Holy One, and refuse to adhere to His commandments. You alter and change His commandments to fit your own sinful lifestyle, when you have no comprehension that Hayah has turned His face from you, for rejecting Him. Son, we are on a battle field. It is evil, versus righteousness. You are fighting a war from the wrong side. Your side loses. You need to change sides before its too late.

              “Why doth thine heart carry thee away? and what do thy eyes wink at, That thou turnest thy spirit against Yah, and lettest such words go out of thy mouth?”

              “Ac 5:39 But if it be of Yah, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against Yah.”

              Decide once and for all, who you are going to serve. If Hayah is Whom you serve, then forsake Baal. But if Baal is whom you serve, then serve him. Dont halt between the two. You cannot serve two masters. If you serve the Yah of Abraham, then serve Him. If Baal, then you reject all that is Hayah, and will lose in the end. Make your choice!

    2. I don’t rely on Google to translate the Bible for me. I use it for limited purposes. The same goes for Strong’s concordance and interlinears. Even with these tools, we are still dependent on translators who know and work with the languages involved. If you think you can produce a better English translation of the Bible than any of the ones we have, then do that. Until then, I’m not going to give up English translations I do have for one I don’t have.

      1. Moron, English translators had no clue what the definitions of words meant 2,000 years ago. They only translated according to the Latin language, which Jerome translated in 300-400 ad. Scholars even today are finding out that their “opinion on certain definitions” was wrong, and are having to revamp their ideas DAILY. Hence the reason why Hayah said, “Trust in Hayah with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.” And again He said, “Ho 13:2 And now they sin more and more, and have made them molten images of their silver, and idols according to their own understanding, all of it the work of the craftsmen: they say of them, Let the men that sacrifice kiss the calves.”

        It is a “craftsmen” that translates from one language to another. Pay attention.

        “And Hayah came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
        6 And Hayah said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
        7 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.
        8 So Hayah scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
        9 Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because Hayah did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did Hayah scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.”

        Hayah scattered the languages not because “He wanted to be preached in every language.” He scattered them, because their “common understanding” became vile, and corrupt, and perverted His ways upon the earth, even as it is today.

        Pentecost was about Hayah spreading His Name, and Word throughout the regions via His tongue, His Word, men that knew and understood Hebrew, and could teach it via the Power of His Name. It was not about “translating.” It was about His elect explaining exactly what the Hebrew scriptures were about. Which none of you today understand. The Truth hurts, get over it. Paul never preached against the law, nor did Christ, but you all reject it because of your lack of knowledge, for which cause you shall perish.

        1. In Acts 2, describing the day of Pentecost, the people said, “Are not all these who are speaking Galileans? And how is it that we each hear them in our own language to which we were born?” Why then do you say they only heard Hebrew?

          1. Is that what I said? No it isnt. The apostles read to the “other languages” from the Hebrew scriptures. Read the book of Acts thoroughly, and you will see that ALL of the apostles taught the people from the “Hebrew scriptures.” They did not quote any Greek text, or from any “translation,” they read from the Hebrew Temple Texts. Paul even taught Gentiles to obey the law, and taught them Joshua Christ FROM the LAW AND THE PROPHETS.

  9. actsapostolos,

    You want us to throw out all English translations. Then you quote English verses with names like “Hayah” and “Yah” in them. But you won’t tell us from what English Bible you get these verses. If you’ve thrown out all English translations, how are you able to give us English verses? Don’t English verses from come from English Bibles?

    1. Excuse me? I quoted to you from the actual texts. Go and compare what I said to any English speaking Bible, and you will see that I quote the actual texts, not any “English perversion.” And stop saying “we,” assuming that others read your BS. That is high mindedness, and conceit.

  10. actsapostolos,

    I always show initial deference to someone who claims to be speaking in the name of the Lord. I try to listen and learn. Only when I listen long enough to find sufficient evidence, do I make a decision to accept or reject what is being said.

    I have read the many comments you have written here, much of which has been repetitive. I find your message, practically speaking, incomprehensible. You are saying that all English translations of the Bible are corrupt. Further, you seem to be saying that the names of God and Jesus are not to be translated into English or any language. I’m not going to give up all English translations of the Bible and trust you in their place. Nor should anyone else.

    You can keep posting here if you want, but I can no longer respond to every repetitive and abstruse claim that you make.

    Jesus is Lord and the Bible is the word of God. That defines the essence of my belief. You have not shaken it.

    P.S. I have given this same response to “mcginnis360” who seems to hold to the same strange doctrine that you do.

    1. First of all, I never said “Yahshua cant be translated into any other tongue.” Yahshua is translated in English as “Joshua.” Not “Jesus.” Jesus is the “Greek translatio9n,” not the English. This is not an “etymology issue,” this is a “satans devices” issue. In the KJV 1611 print, the name “Jesus” was never used. The first print called Him “Iesus,” which later (around 1700), the “I” was changed to a “J.” This does NOT make this an “English name” all because we changed “one letter.” In Greek, (if Greek had a “J”) it would be “Jesus.” It is not, and thus His Name is not “Jesus,” it IS Joshua. Secondly, “Moron scholars” translated Hayah (The Fathers Name) to “I AM,” not “Jehovah, not God, not Lord, not Yehovah, or “Yahweh.” “I AM” is an incorrec t English translation of His Name, because His Name is “Hayah,” which means “The Existence.” You could not “Exist” if He wasnt “breathing in you.” “I AM” does not mean “The Existence,” it simply means “I am here.” This is incorrectly translated into the English. I am Hebrew, I both speak, and understand the Hebrew, and for you all to reject the Hebrew, makes you a “respecter of persons, and a hater of the Israel people as a whole, since it was “HAYAH” that said YOU WILL REJOICE *WITH* MY PEOPLE.” Not all are “Israel, that are from Israel, but they of the seed of Abraham are Hayahs Sons.” That is, not they which are in Israel today, are Abrahams offspring. Abrahams offspring are spiritual, not “by blood.” Rightly divide the Word, which NO CHURCH, or “non-church-goer” understands how to do, nor the the spiritual realm of Yah. Get this through your head, “There are few that follow Christ, not many.” There are few that understand, yes, even few righteous, not “many.” There are “few” of His elect, not “many.” There are “few that walk in the spirit” not “many.” Read the scriptures (throwing away the bs theology, hermeneutics, exegesis that are the traditions of corrupt men), and see ALL that I have spoken from the first, to the last comment are ALL BIBLICAL. “Reading “a” bible does not make you “spiritual” in ANY WAY.” Walking IN THE SPIRIT REALM, speaking with Hayah and Joshua face to face, hearing HIS voice, conversing WITH HIM, and He with you is what makes you “spiritual.” Not following scholars which are the wise of this world, that Hayah demands are “fools.” Not following “commentaries which are mens foolishness, and opinion,” not following “corrupted texts, that someone translated for their own personal gain,” Abraham was “Hayah’s Friend.” We are commanded to be “Joshua Christs Friend.” A friend does not believe another friend based on anothers opinion of that friend, or based on someones opinion of that friend. You might as well “take an atheists word” (which you already are) to learn how to “befriend Christ.” Because that is EXACTLY what you all are doing.

      Do you even have the slightest idea what a “scribe” is? A scribe is a scholar. It is someone who has spent so much time in “writing, and translation,” they dont even believe what they are writing, or what they are translating. There is no such thing as a “scribe writing without an opinion of the text.” He either has a negative opinion (which is going to produce so much error in writing/translation, etc.), or he believes what he writes/translates (which he is going to lean the texts towards his belief, not according to actual texts).

      Example (and stay with me): If I believe in a “trinity,” anywhere I find that Hayah could be used in a “plural sense,” I am going to make the text read “us, we, our, etc.” There is no “us, we, or our” in any Hebrew text. English translators “added (which Hayah said NOT TO DO)” these words to the English translations. Nowhere in any text, is Joshua referred to as “God, or Hayah,” as it is even written (and witnessed by Himself) that He was “created,” not “eternal.” The “Jews (which were not Jews, they were a Babylonian sect of teachers established by Nebuchadnezzar)” hated Joshua, not because “He professed to be “god.” He stated He was “the Son of Yah” which in those days, sons (which is a full mature adult) were equals to their fathers, they were not against Him for saying He was “god,” because He never did. Son in the Greek is “Huios” which means a “Perfect, fully mature adult.” Jews were of the idea that “ONLY ONE (which you all believe the same) was Perfect,” and that was Yah. Joshua commanded us to be “Perfect, even as Yah is Perfect.” The concept of “man cannot be perfect” came from a Babylonian doctrine, it carries no weight with the Word of Yah. Case in point:

      “Ge 6:9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.” KJV

      “Ge 17:1 ¶ And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the LORD appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect.” KJV

      “De 18:13 Thou shalt be perfect with Hayah thy Yah.” HBI

      “2Sa 22:33 Yah is my strength and power: and he maketh my way perfect.”

      “1Ki 8:61 Let your heart therefore be perfect with Hayah our Yah, to walk in his statutes, and to keep his commandments, as at this day.” HBI

      “2Ch 16:9 For the eyes of Hayah run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to shew himself strong in the behalf of them whose heart is perfect toward him. Herein thou hast done foolishly: therefore from henceforth thou shalt have wars.” HBI

      “Job 1:1 ¶ There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared Yah, and eschewed evil.” HBI

      “Pr 2:21 For the upright shall dwell in the land, and the perfect shall remain in it.” KJV

      “Eph 4:13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of YAH, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ…” HBI

      “Php 3:15 ¶ Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded: and if in any thing ye be otherwise minded, Yah shall reveal even this unto you.” HBI

      There is no such thing with Hayah, as the doctrine of “we cannot be perfect in the flesh.” That is a man made doctrine, and is a sin to even preach. As you can see, I utilized both the KJV, and the HBI (Hebrew Bible Interlinear) to show you that the word “perfect” is in both translations.
      The Hebrew word “perfect” is “tamiym” which means “one that is righteous, upright, complete, just, without blemish, sin, or fault.”

      As you can clearly see, Hayah has His elect, His “few” that are “perfect, upright, Justified, Righteous, without sin, complete,” in every generation, that have not “bowed the knee to Baal (lord, or lord gawd, Jehovah, Yahweh, etc.)”

      “Hayah hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to Yah against Israel, saying, Yah, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life. But what saith the answer of Hayah unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal (lord, or lord gawd). Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.”

      Hayah has reserved unto Himself seven thousand (only) in every generation that have not bowed the knee to the images of Baal (Zeus, Lord, God (gawd), Jehovah, Jesus). Knees do not bow to Jesus, as you have been lied to so much about. The knee is to be bowed to “YAHshua (Joshua in English) the Son of YAH.” Even in China (ask any Chinese person) they call him “Jesus,” they dont call Him by a “Chinese name.” Welcome to Baal. Joshua is the Name to be glorified to the ends of the earth, not “Hey-soos (hail zeus).”

    2. You: “I always show initial deference to someone who claims to be speaking in the name of the Lord. I try to listen and learn.”

      You have not listened, nor learned a thing from me, nor Whom I serve. You listen to scholars, corrupters, perverted men, that follow traditions of men and the Roman Catholic Church which has been in apostasy since its foundation. Please, do not ever tell anyone that “you learned anything from me,” as I want no association with the corruption you preach. I preach THE WAY, THE TRUTH, AND THE LIFE! His Name is Joshua (Yahshua) Christ, the Son of Hayah (Christ).

  11. Brother, here is another interesting little fact. The Codex Sinaiticus, written in 300ad, is the oldest living manuscript the Greek NT, and nowhere does the name “Iesous” appear in it. Instead what is written, is “IY XY,” for Yahshuah’s Name, which in Greek is “Iota Chi.” Not “Iesous.” Dont believe me? Look it up yourself. Iesous in Greek is “Ihsouv,” or “Iesous.” Yet in the Codex (which is even older than the Septuagint) it appears as “IY XY.” Which literally means “Iota Chi (ky).” It is not pronounced “Iesous” nor is it “shorthand,” or an “abbreviation.” It is a Greek corrupted form of the Name “Yahoshua (Joshua in English).”

    @ the end of the first line, you will see 4 Greek letters that are His Name, and they are found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and Revelations in the same manner. They are found throughout the document, but unless you spent around 10 painstaking years looking for all the places these “4 letters” appear, you would find it throughout the Codex.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.